Wednesday, June 15, 2011

justin bieber with glasses 2011

images justin bieber singing cartoon justin bieber with glasses 2011. Queue justin and glasses album
  • Queue justin and glasses album



  • AK_GC
    03-16 05:05 PM
    ...2 letters.





    wallpaper Queue justin and glasses album justin bieber with glasses 2011. Justin+ieber+haircut+2011
  • Justin+ieber+haircut+2011



  • alkg
    10-24 10:19 AM
    July 2nd Filer.
    Reciept notice received on October 11th on Phone.
    Waiting for EAD,AP.
    FP Not Done

    Still waiting for physical receipts ,EAD and AP.............
    :mad::(:confused:





    justin bieber with glasses 2011. Justin Bieber amp; Angelina Jolie
  • Justin Bieber amp; Angelina Jolie



  • snathan
    05-11 06:10 PM
    Hi,

    I have attended for H1b renual in toronto on the 2nd of May. The VO decided to do some additional review on the application. He took the Cleint letter, vendor letter and I129. Still havent heard anything from the consulate.

    I am not sure if I should stay in Toronto or travel to India. I have taken only single entry visa to canada.

    So, do you know if there is a canadian consulate in Hyderabad. If there is one, how much time do they take to issue a visitor visa.

    Also, most importantly, how much time does it take for the 221g processing.

    I would really appreciate if someone could share their knowledge.

    Thanks

    Where are you staying in Toronto. If you are staying with any relatives...you should try to stay there until you get the papers back from the VO.





    2011 Justin+ieber+haircut+2011 justin bieber with glasses 2011. justin bieber collage middot; ideas
  • justin bieber collage middot; ideas



  • LondonTown
    03-08 03:32 PM
    Thanks Drak. My attorney states otherwise though. He states that I-485 will be denied only after the ultimate denial of the I-140, which he says might take even about a year, and that in the mean time, I-485 will be valid and that she can continue to work on EAD.

    P E R P L E X E D !!

    I took advise of two lawyers (one is very famous) and both told that if I40 is denied/appealed - do not use EAD and file another PERM immediately, which I did.



    more...


    justin bieber with glasses 2011. Justin Bieber#39;s Hair Gets Lots
  • Justin Bieber#39;s Hair Gets Lots



  • rajuram
    06-11 04:46 PM
    Will this not clog the system? How do you think they will approve GCs if we bombard them with letters and queries? They have only so much resources.





    justin bieber with glasses 2011. justin bieber with glasses on.
  • justin bieber with glasses on.



  • Loruoo26
    02-14 12:47 PM
    Everyone is entitled to have an opinion. When it comes to opinions, though, there's a difference between the majority wow gold (http://www.wowpl.de), of people and celebrities like actors, athletes, and rock stars. If you're an average person, only your family and friends care about your opinion. If you’re famous, the whole world listens, or so it seems sometimes. Is this the way if should be? I don't think so.   We shouldn't pay attention to famous people's opinions just because of who they are. Being a famous basketball player doesn't make someone an expert on environmental issues. However, that basketball player has a better opportunity to be heard than most wow gold (http://www.wowleveln.de), people do. If that player feels very strongly about an issue, he can use his fame to draw attention to it and get other people involved. That way they can saw attention and needed dollars to that issue.   People who are rich put their money behind a cause. In the same way, famous people are using their most valuable asset. In their case, it's not money. It's their name recognition. Should people pay attention to what they think just because of who maple story powerleveling (http://www.maplestorymesosshop.com/maple-story-power-leveling.asp), they are? I don’t think so. I also don't think we should discount what they think just because of who they are. They have a right to their opinion. If their name draws people to that cause, all the better for the cause.   I think too often we categories people and try to keep them in their place. maple story powerleveling (http://www.maplestorymesosstore.com/maple-story-power-leveling.asp), Celebrities have brains and should be allowed to use them. When they're advocating a cause, their opinion should be just one of many factors we use to evaluate that cause.Everyone is entitled to have an opinion. When maple story powerleveling (http://www.mesosoon.com/maple-story-power-leveling.asp),it comes to opinions, though, there's a difference between the majority of people and celebrities like actors, athletes, and rock stars. If you're an average person, only your family and friends care about your opinion. If you’re famous, the whole world listens, or so it seems sometimes. Is this the way if should be? I don't think so.   We shouldn't pay attention to famous people's opinions just because of who they are. Being a famous basketball player doesn't make someone an expert on environmental issues. However, that basketball player has a better opportunity to be heard than most people do. If that player feels very strongly about an issue, he can use his fame to draw attention to it and get other people involved. That way they can saw attention and needed dollars to that issue.   People who are rich put their money behind a cause. In the same way, famous people are using their most valuable asset. In their case, it's not money. It's their name recognition. Should people pay attention to what they think just because of who they are? I don’t think so. I also don't think we should discount what they think just because of who they are. They have a right to their opinion. If their name draws people to that cause, all the better for the cause.   I think too often we categories people and try to keep them in their place. Celebrities have brains and should be allowed to use them. When they're advocating a cause, their opinion should be just one of many factors we use to evaluate that cause.



    more...


    justin bieber with glasses 2011. justin bieber hair glasses
  • justin bieber hair glasses



  • texcan
    02-21 12:03 AM
    How about the opposite problem. The LC wages are lower that what I am being paid. the LC reflects what I was being paid at the time it was filed. not sure if the lawyer screwed up. Right now, I am doing a similar job (non-IT, non-technical), but with wider responsibility and earning ~ 40% more. What now??
    -a

    Lawyers are the sole reason for these confusion, you cant have lower pay than what is mentioned in LCA; you cant have higher pay than what is mentioned in LCA....
    I bet you a lawyer can and will justify both rules, why because this is what they do....;-)
    USCIS rules are such a mess.....god help us all.

    on lighter note...
    One other easier solution is "you promise to pay extra money to "desi_hydrabadi"
    issue solved...your salary matches LCA...desi_hydrabadi gets more money his salary matches LCA....

    both get GC...
    relax and live hapily....

    Just kidding man, donot think too much about it...i was worrying about this issue ( higher pay than LCA)...i did worry for quite a while and
    a good friend said donot worry ...something will take care of it...
    needless to say he was right...(economy did take care of issue for me...).





    2010 Justin Bieber amp; Angelina Jolie justin bieber with glasses 2011. justin bieber singing cartoon
  • justin bieber singing cartoon



  • reddy77
    04-13 08:23 AM
    Thanks guys for all your responses, much appreciated. not sure whats the RFE about, still waiting for the document, little bit tensed ....



    more...


    justin bieber with glasses 2011. Justin Bieber Formal amp; Casual
  • Justin Bieber Formal amp; Casual



  • simple1
    09-16 04:19 PM
    If you are genuine: Don’t do it. It will affect your GC.

    If you are losers guild member using Indian name to post: Leave this forum immediately. I am tired of fake posts. I personally believe Riakapoor and ar7165 are fake.

    you can apply for UI - Unemployment insurance, NOT Unemployment benefit. The first is an insurance, the second a benefit that will impact your GC application.

    Hello All,

    I am on a dependent EAD. I lost my job (laid off) few days back. Can I enroll for unemplyment benefits as i am reading the threads that dependents can enroll into UB. But just want to make sure before going forward. We are on I-485 pending status.

    Please suggest.

    Thanks in Advance!

    My gc is in process, both I-140 and I-485 is approved over 180 days back. I have a valid EAD. Recently I lost my job (laid off). Can I apply for unemployment benefit?





    hair justin bieber collage middot; ideas justin bieber with glasses 2011. justin bieber in purple
  • justin bieber in purple



  • hsm2007
    09-21 07:42 AM
    Does it matter if it is Junior attorney or senior attorney in Murthy firm. I am not getting any appointments with senior until Friday.




    First thing you need to do is setup a 30 min - 1 hour appointment with an experienced Attorney (Khanna/ Murthy/ Ron) You can have a telephonic discussion. Do not think about money and go for the best.

    During discussion bring up the topic of new employment (C) as well .

    If you have the format from your current company attorney , show it to them .

    It might be simpler then you are thinking.



    more...


    justin bieber with glasses 2011. justin bieber selena 2011
  • justin bieber selena 2011



  • navyug
    06-24 07:27 PM
    Hi all,
    We applied for my wife's and mine EAD on April 27th (paper based)
    I got the receipt notice on 05/08/2010 and checks were cashed on 05/08/2010

    I am okay, because I am on H1B, my wife has a business and employs 2 people full time.
    She doesn't draw any salary from the business, except she has business on her name and the accounts on her name as well.

    Additionally , she has a valid H4 as well.
    I know its too early to panic, but if I didnt get her EAd card by July 31st, are we in trouble

    Pls reply
    Thanks in advance

    As long as she is not drawing a Salary, she is fine. She can continue to manage the business.





    hot Justin Bieber#39;s Hair Gets Lots justin bieber with glasses 2011. justin bieber in glasses
  • justin bieber in glasses



  • hmehta
    09-12 07:20 PM
    Yes, you can take "Leave without pay" - you will not be out of status. Even if you are not getting paid you still are on company payroll.

    As someone suggested earlier, if a woman on H1-B is pregnant, she can surely take maternity leave without going out of status.



    more...


    house Or show screeningjustin bieber justin bieber with glasses 2011. Celebs Who Wear Glasses
  • Celebs Who Wear Glasses



  • gsc999
    01-17 10:46 PM
    Hello Northern California,

    We are going to kick start a huge "Sign & Dine" campaign in Northern California to support Administrative Fix effort. This is the time to show your support.

    This is what we need:

    - We need you to join us and show support for IV at a social event this Sunday(01/20) @ 11:30 a.m. in Sunnyvale. PM me or join Nor. Cal IV Yahoo group for details regarding address of the venue. We will have the Admin Fix letters ready for you to sign. So come and put your signatures and we will have some tasty snacks ready for you to eat***

    - We need volunteers to call other IV members and motivate them to join the Admin Fix letter campaign

    - We need volunteers to do some foot work in areas that have high legal immigrant traffic. I have done this, trust me, it is exciting work. We will provide you with flyers etc, we just need your time.

    - Any other way you can help

    Cheers!

    ***If you don't sign, that means no snacks





    tattoo justin bieber with glasses on. justin bieber with glasses 2011. Following Justin Bieber#39;s
  • Following Justin Bieber#39;s



  • satishku_2000
    08-23 10:01 PM
    Response times are now determined by service centers. Earlier it used be be 12 weeks but now it depends on evidence type



    Memo accoring to murthy.com

    http://www.murthy.com/news/n_restim.html

    USCIS Clarification on Response Time for RFEs/NOIDs
    Posted Jun 22, 2007
    �MurthyDotCom
    The USCIS is implementing changes with respect to the deadlines for responses to Requests for Evidence (RFEs) and Notices of Intent to Deny (NOIDs). MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers were informed of the final rule on flexible response times for RFEs in our May 4, 2007 article, USCIS Regulation on Response Time for RFEs and NOIDs.
    �MurthyDotCom
    The USCIS now has issued further clarification regarding timeframes for RFE and NOID responses in its June 1, 2007 interoffice memorandum. This guidance was issued to the appropriate USCIS directors in order to clarify procedures that became effective on June 18, 2007. This guidance is intended to establish the proper RFE and NOID deadlines, now that we will no longer be operating under the earlier, standard 12-week response time for an RFE and 30-day response time for a NOID.
    �MurthyDotCom
    TYPES OF FILINGS FOR RESPONSE WITHIN 30 DAYS
    �MurthyDotCom
    Missing or Incomplete Initial Evidence
    �MurthyDotCom
    According to the USCIS's June 1, 2007 guidance, applicants and petitioners can be given 30 days to submit missing initial evidence that the form requires, regardless of the nature of the form. Initial evidence is essentially basic, required documentation that is fundamentally necessary in each case.
    �MurthyDotCom
    The USCIS can deny a case outright for a lack of initial evidence. The issuance of an RFE is purely discretionary on the part of the USCIS, when, in their opinion, the initial evidence was not provided with the filing.
    �MurthyDotCom
    I-539 Requests to Extend / Change Nonimmigrant Status
    �MurthyDotCom
    The USCIS also established a 30-day response time to any RFE issued with regard to Form I-539 (Request to Extend / Change Nonimmigrant Status). The Memo explained that the USCIS determined lengthy RFE response times to be inconsistent with the purpose of Form I-539. Therefore, RFEs related to Form I-539 filings will have 30 days to respond.
    �MurthyDotCom
    OTHER TYPES OF RFE RESPONSES
    �MurthyDotCom
    Evidence Available within the U.S. : 42 Days
    �MurthyDotCom
    If the USCIS believes that the missing evidence is available within the U.S., the RFE response typically will be 42 days. This applies to all forms, other than the I-539, discussed above.
    �MurthyDotCom
    Evidence to be Obtained from Abroad
    �MurthyDotCom
    If missing evidence is available only from outside the U.S., then the USCIS typically will provide applicants and/or petitioners with up to a total of 84 days to respond to the RFE. This also applies to all forms, with the exception of the I-539, discussed above.
    �MurthyDotCom
    CONCLUSION
    �MurthyDotCom
    It is now more important than ever to make every effort to completely document a case before filing. The importance of providing all of the initial required evidence is going to become even more important now than before. Failure to respond to an RFE, with all the required evidence and in a timely fashion, will likely result in a denial. It is important to take the time to file correctly, rather than rush. At the Murthy Law Firm, we believe that it is always better to obtain a slow approval than a quick denial!



    more...


    pictures justin bieber hair glasses justin bieber with glasses 2011. Justin Bieber Pictures 2011
  • Justin Bieber Pictures 2011



  • hebron
    04-17 07:04 PM
    Hi Guys,
    Any suggestions for my post above? It will be really helpful.

    Thanks in advance!!





    dresses justin bieber in glasses justin bieber with glasses 2011. hair 3 Feb 2011 . justin
  • hair 3 Feb 2011 . justin



  • Jaime
    08-06 12:12 PM
    Yeah, why not? As long as Legals ALSO get green cards!

    On The Washington Post today:

    A Less Ambitious Approach to Immigration

    By Arlen Specter
    Monday, August 6, 2007; Page A17

    The charge of amnesty defeated comprehensive immigration reform in the Senate this summer. It is too important, and there has been too much legislative investment, not to try again. The time to do so is now.

    Certainly the government should implement the provisions it has already enacted to improve border security and crack down on employers who knowingly hire illegal immigrants. But the important additions on those subjects contained in the bill defeated in June will not be enacted without also dealing with the 12 million-plus undocumented immigrants and the guest worker program.

    So let's take a fresh look and try a narrower approach.

    There is a consensus in Congress on most objectives and many remedies for immigration reform: more border patrols, additional fencing, drones and some form of a guest worker program. Modern technological advances provide foolproof identification so employers can -- justifiably -- be severely sanctioned if they don't verify IDs and act to eliminate the magnet attracting illegals to penetrate the border. Yet Congress is unlikely to appropriate $3 billion for border security without dealing simultaneously with the illegal immigrants already here.

    The main objective in legalizing the 12 million was to eliminate their fugitive status, allowing them to live in the United States without fear of being detected and deported or being abused by unscrupulous employers. We should consider a revised status for those 12 million people. Let them hold the status of those with green cards -- without the automatic path to citizenship that was the core component of critics' argument that reform efforts were really amnesty. Give these people the company of their spouses and minor children and consider other indicators of citizenship short of the right to vote (which was always the dealbreaker).

    This approach may be attacked as creating an "underclass" inconsistent with American values, which have always been to give refuge to the "huddled masses." But such a compromise is clearly better than leaving these people a fugitive class. People with a lesser status are frequently referred to as second-class citizens. Congress has adamantly refused to make the 12 million people already here full citizens, but isn't it better for them to at least be secure aliens than hunted and exploited?

    Giving these people green-card status leaves open the opportunity for them to return to their native lands and seek citizenship through regular channels. Or, after our borders are secured and tough employer sanctions have been put in place, Congress can revisit the issue and possibly find a more hospitable America.

    Some of the other refinements of the defeated bill can await another day and the regular process of Judiciary Committee hearings and markups. Changing the law on family unification with a point system can also be considered later. Now, perhaps, we could add green cards for highly skilled workers and tinker at the edges of immigration law, providing we don't get bogged down in endless debate and defeated cloture motions.

    It would be refreshing if Congress, and the country, could come together in a bipartisan way to at least partially solve one of the big domestic issues of the day.

    The writer, a senator from Pennsylvania, is the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee.



    more...


    makeup Justin Bieber Formal amp; Casual justin bieber with glasses 2011. Or show screeningjustin bieber
  • Or show screeningjustin bieber



  • forever_waiting
    03-06 10:44 PM
    Deadline added to this initiative to decide whether to proceed or not.
    please see post below for details.

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum14-members-forum/1599353-want-to-file-485-when-pd-is-not-current-gather-here-104.html#post2412248

    Since this is a brand new initiation why don't we make a fresh thread for it? Right now this thread is so full of bumps that many may not actually read this message.
    Also, should we at some point agree on what letter must be written?

    [QUote = ashwin_27]

    As suggested by several members on this thread, IV has set a goal of April 30th, 2011 to determine if there is even enough appetite within the EB community to proceed with this USCIS Admin Fix initiative or not.
    As we know the initial goal was to use this survey to determine how many members will be benefitted by I-485 filing without current priority date. Rough calculations using PERM data showed that at least 50-70K folks are waiting to file I-485 since July 2007 (around 5K-6K out of this number are those with PDs prior to June/July 2007 missed the July 2007 boat).
    So far we have had around 1200 such members respond. We need to see support of at least 5000 members in order for IV to launch the public action items. These action items include, but are not limited to, writing en-masse (i.e. in thousands) over 2-3 weeks to several concerned departments about the need for this USCIS administrative fix. Few other very interesting proposals/ideas are also being considered. All we need is our folks to BELIEVE that this initiative is worth investing in.
    The IV forum is the best place for the impacted EB community to gather and that is why the number of votes on the survey is a great indication of our frustration and motivation to work with IV for this important admin fix.
    So, we now have a Deadline and an Objective. It is up to our impacted members to decide on whether to still stick to silly excuses (why should I become a member, why should i vote on survey etc etc.) or DO something about getting this admin fix. It is surprising that we are not more desperate for this fix and are not convincing and pushing IV harder and harder to start working with USCIS to allow I485 filing with current PD (and all the benefits like EAD, AP that go with it).
    Are we more comfortable with the alternative - Waiting endelesslly to file I-485 (at least 2-5 years for post July 2007 folks from any category), keep depending on H1B extensions in an uncertain immigration scenario where H1B RFE's, rejections, visa denials due to "admin processing" etc are on a steep rise? The choice is ours to make.
    As a final reminder - please act and convince your friends/colleagues to participate in this initiative and send ivcoordinator@gmail.com the details requested below.
    Please keep following and participating on this thread to show your desperation for this fix.





    girlfriend Following Justin Bieber#39;s justin bieber with glasses 2011. justin bieber hair glasses
  • justin bieber hair glasses



  • gchopefull
    10-02 02:27 PM
    the RFE was on Ability to Pay





    hairstyles justin bieber selena 2011 justin bieber with glasses 2011. Justin bieber new haircut
  • Justin bieber new haircut



  • jscris
    July 15th, 2004, 12:58 PM
    I love my Better Beamer. :) I think my last posted shot of the brightly sunlit finch wouldn't have been usable without the fill flash. Can you handhold that 300 2.8?
    Janet





    nitkad
    03-20 04:28 PM
    Hi,

    I heard that USCIS revoked the I140s for all the applicants who were employee of certain company as the company was fraud. In this case what happens? I have a very genuine case but I think my company may be doing some weird things.

    Thanks





    BharatPremi
    10-13 02:45 AM
    Hi Guys,

    I Fedex my 485 package on July, 11th and it got reached to USCIS on July, 12 (I have the acknolegement) but still did not receive the receipt number. I am seeing who filed after me started getting receipt numbers.

    I am kind of concerned about it as I did not see any movement in my case.

    Any inputs Or wondering if anybody else facing similar situation??????

    Appreciate your inputs.

    Thanks,

    M

    1) Call USCIS
    2) INofrm that you filed 90 days before.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment